|  New Posts
 
 
 


Reply
 
Author Comment
 
choux
Reply with quote #1 
"If Jesus died for all the sins of all men, if He expiated all our sins and propitiated all our sins, then everybody would be saved. A potential atonement is not a real atonement". - Chosen by God p. 179.

Sproul is aware that if Christ died for all then all will eventually be saved. For he knows that the scripture teaches that God's purpose cannot be thwarted.


God will circumcise your heart to love the Lord your God (Deu. 30:6)

I know that you can do all things, and that no purpose of Yours can be thwarted. (Job 42:2)

Blessed is the man You choose and cause to approach You. (Ps. 65:4)

The lot is cast into the lap, but it's every decision is from the Lord. (Pr. 16:33)

There are many plans in a man's heart, nevertheless the Lord's counsel - that will stand (Pr. 19:21)

A man's steps are of the Lord; How then can a man understand his own way? (Pr. 20:24)

I will do all my pleasure...indeed... I will bring it pass. I have purposed it; I will do it (Is. 46:10-11)


In fact the Bible does teach that Christ died for all:

Therefore, as one trespass led to condemnation to all men so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life to all men. For as by the one man's disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the One man's obedience the many will be made righteous. Rom. 5:18-19

1 John 2:2

He is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world.


In dealing with this text calvinists will insist that it is referring to Jewish believers as opposed to Gentile believers. In other words the text says:

He is the propitiation for our sins (Jewish believers), and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world. (Gentile believers scattered throughout the whole world)

But clearly this isn't the context. If we go a few verses later to a different chapter in the same book the same exact phrase appears:

1 John 5:18-19:

We know that everyone who has been born of God does not keep on sinning....We know that we are from God, and the whole world lies in the power of the evil one.


Clearly the contrast is between believers and non-believers. He is the propitiation for our sins (believers) and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world. (unbelievers)

1 Tim 4:10:

"For it is for this we labor and strive, because we have fixed our hope on the living God, who is the Savior of all men, especially of believers"

Since God wills all to be saved and His plans cannot be thwarted then it follows logically that all will be saved. In this life or the next.



depthcharge623
Reply with quote #2 
Oh man, seriously dude.  Get a grip.  Keep it to one thread!
Michael
Reply with quote #3 
Is this four or five now?
Archsage
Reply with quote #4 
Wow. Why can't you just stick to one single thread? It's bad enough that trolls exist, but why do some of them have to be Christian? Oi.
choux
Reply with quote #5 

I thought I would start a thread on the positve evidence. Clearly it's there.

bm359
Reply with quote #6 
I appreciated the thread...just sayin'
jonahbear
Reply with quote #7 

Universalism doesn't bother me.  In fact, it would be lovely to think that all will be saved in the end.

However, we do find plenty of scripture supporting a judgment and that hell is something unpleasant and tangible.

Choux, what do you do with these verses?  I also note that most of the verses you cite come from the OT.  what about Jesus' clear teachment on judgment in the NT?  How do you dismiss that?


EDIT:  Never mind, I see the other thread addressing my questions above.  However, the mental gymnastics required to believe that only angels will be condemned to hell gives me pause to think there is not much substance to the argument (though it would be nice to be able to support it).

choux
Reply with quote #8 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonahbear

Universalism doesn't bother me.  In fact, it would be lovely to think that all will be saved in the end.

However, we do find plenty of scripture supporting a judgment and that hell is something unpleasant and tangible.

Choux, what do you do with these verses?  I also note that most of the verses you cite come from the OT.  what about Jesus' clear teachment on judgment in the NT?  How do you dismiss that?


EDIT:  Never mind, I see the other thread addressing my questions above.  However, the mental gymnastics required to believe that only angels will be condemned to hell gives me pause to think there is not much substance to the argument (though it would be nice to be able to support it).


I don't think it is mental gymnastics. "forever" and "eternal" doesn't always mean "forever" and "eternal" when we are dealing with God's judgment. Consider that Israel's judgment lasts "forever" until the Spirit is poured out and God restores it:


Is. 32:13-15

 for the soil of my people
growing up in thorns and briers,
yes, for all the joyous houses
in the exultant city.
14 For the palace is forsaken,
the populous city deserted;
the hill and the watchtower
will become dens forever,
a joy of wild donkeys,
a pasture of flocks;
15 until the Spirit is poured upon us from on high,
and the wilderness becomes a fruitful field,
and the fruitful field is deemed a forest.
16 Then justice will dwell in the wilderness,
and righteousness abide in the fruitful field.
17 And the effect of righteousness will be peace,
and the result of righteousness, quietness and trust forever
choux
Reply with quote #9 

Something else to consider about "Eternal Punnishment" is that "forever" and "eternal" don't always mean "forever" and "eternal" even when they are parallel. We see this in Ro. 16:25,26 where the word is used twice in the same context referring to something temporal and also to God.

Now to Him who is able to strengthen you....according to the mystery that was kept secret for LONG AGES. but has now been disclosed and through the prophetic writings has been made known to all nations, according to the command of the ETERNAL God.

Here's another in Hab. 3:6

He stood and measured the earth;
he looked and shook the nations;
then the eternal mountains were scattered;
the everlasting hills sank low.
His were the everlasting ways.

The hills aren't everlasting but God's ways are.

The word is a relative term depending on the subject with which it is associated. Matt. 25:46 contains an additional clue that this may be the case. The word punnishment is kolasis and it carries with it the idea of correction. As Barclay notes:

The Greek word for punnishment here is kolasis, which was not orginally an ethical word at all. It originally meant the pruning of trees to make them grow better. I think it is true to say that in all Greek secular literature kolasis is never used of anything but remedial punnishment.

Also, in Is. 34:8-10 the word doesn't mean "forever " in reference to God's punnishment. His anger lasts a moment but His mercy endures forever.


For the Lord has a day of vengeance, a year of recompence for the cause of Zion. And the streams of Edom shall be turned to pitch, and her soil into sulfur, and her land shall become burning pitch. Night and day it shall not be quenched; it's smoke shall go up forever.

This is the exact same language used in Rev. Notice the text says that the fire will not be quenched day and night. It's smoke is said to ascend forever even though Edom isn't still burning today. It went out long ago.

choux
Reply with quote #10 

Literal translations:

YLT - punnishment age-during

RT - age-abiding correction

WT - punnishment of the ages

CLT - chastening eonian

Tisthammerw
Reply with quote #11 
Quote:
Originally Posted by bm359
I appreciated the thread...just sayin'

Me too.  I knew there was some Scriptural evidence for universalism, but I didn't know what it was.

Not that I'm sold on universalism being true or on it being the best scripturally supported theory on who will be saved (see e.g. Revelation 14:11), but it's nice to know what Bible verses one could cite as (at least some degree of) evidence for universalism.
Waytruthlight
Reply with quote #12 
The weight of scripture is on the side of universalism. The weight of nde reports are also. Reason would strongly suggest that a god who is love beyond our comprehension of the greatest love simply could not condemn any of his creation to eternal torment or annihilation. Annihilation being an abrogation of free will which arminianism gives as the rationale for eternal hell ie people in a few short years freely choose eternity in hell. Calvinism that puts God's will above free will of ours and argues for eternal damnation by God's choice for the "non-elect" is simply an evil doctrine that grotesquely perverts the idea of a loving papa God that Jesus revealed.
idunno
Reply with quote #13 
I don't see how you could say that the weight of Scripture is on the side of universalism considering you didn't quote any.
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Quick Navigation:



Important: The Reasonable Faith forums have moved to: www.reasonablefaith.org/forums/






Powered by Website Toolbox - Create a Website Forum Hosting, Guestbook Hosting, or Website Chat Room for your website.