|  New Posts
 
 
 


Reply
 
Author Comment
 
unluckynumber11
Reply with quote  #31 
I stopped going to cracked ever since one of their authors stated that the hypothetical existence of aliens would disprove the bible.
CrashTestAuto
Reply with quote  #32 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawlessone777


While you may think I'd agree with you in spirit, Crash, the reality is that you're wrong in this statement. On the internet, or at least in the minds of popular atheists such as Dawkins, Harris, or Hitchens, insulting something is tantamount to providing a positive argument against that thing. Similarly, atheists on these boards who engage in such behaviour genuinely believe deep down that they're providing an articulate rebuttal of Christianity by engaging in such trollish behaviour.



Given that proving yourself correct would require you to be psychic, or them to have openly stated this, then it seems a little bold of you to claim I am flat out wrong.  Given you make personal attacks on atheists all the time (generally, against Dawkins etc, and against specific board members) I could equally infer that you think insults replace arguments.  I don't infer this, because it is a silly thing to suppose of a person.  This is especially true when referring to Hitchens and Harris, who are both highly intelligent people, and Dawkins, who is about as dedicated to the scientific method as they get.

Quote:


And something that I'm fully willing to admit is that it is perfectly okay for Christians to become upset when someone calls their lord and saviour an "invisible sky daddy" or an "iron age myth". And it is similarly okay for Christians to stand up to those kinds of trolls who engage in this behaviour and confront them on it. Would you insist that a Christian who is being mocked and berrated accept this abuse simply because by defending themself they appear less "christ like" to those they may seek to convert?

This kind of logic has never sat well with me, and when given always seems to me like a rationalization of why Christians shouldn't swing back when someone takes a shot at their chin metaphorically. The kind of insulting and trollish behaviour we see on the net, such as on sites like YT, Memebase, etc, is simply infantile and unacceptable, and Christians have to endure wave after wave of this vulgarity on almost every site we want to go to. I've been to Christian websites that have nothing to do with apologetics that are simply overrun with these trolls.

And for a Christian to actually confront this behaviour and ask for support for the arrogance held by these atheist trolls is not at all out of line, nor do I feel bad at all for engaging in it. I for one would love to see more Christians confronting those atheists who insult, mock, and belittle believers. Just because we're meant to be sheep in faith in Christ, does not mean that we must allow ourselves to be victims of verbal harassment and abuse.


Turn the other cheek, love your enemies?  Not seeing any reason that a representative of Christ might be compelled to rise above petty internet name calling?
Jerome92085
Reply with quote  #33 
I empathize with lawlessone's frustration. Every site I visit these days amateur philosophers try to show how the God hypothesis fails, with the most asinine of rhetoric. I actually had one guy tell me the other day "You got pwnt with logic <3." At this point I just don't bother. An honest seeker will take the time to truly seek out the answers and follow the evidence where it leads. We're on a site that is dedicated to an intellectual defense of the Christian faith for goodness' sake. There is material all over. Why can't any of the new atheists--popular and common--take the time to study what's available? I can't tell you how enlightened I feel reading Plantinga's book or going to apologetics lectures. Every question I had I was always provided with an articulate and comprehensive response. What more could a person ask for? Overwhelmingly, I just think there is a lack of education in the general public. Nowhere do we see much more ignorance than online. People all over the web think they have the knowledge and skills to really "defeat" or "challenge" arguments--some centuries old. Engage the person. But if the person has silly responses or just appears to disagree for the sake of disagreeing then don't bother. There's more productive things to do with your time. Life's short. Don't waste it on amateurish and immature people.
Lawlessone777
Reply with quote  #34 
Quote:
Given that proving yourself correct would require you to be psychic, or them to have openly stated this, then it seems a little bold of you to claim I am flat out wrong.  Given you make personal attacks on atheists all the time (generally, against Dawkins etc, and against specific board members) I could equally infer that you think insults replace arguments.  I don't infer this, because it is a silly thing to suppose of a person.  This is especially true when referring to Hitchens and Harris, who are both highly intelligent people, and Dawkins, who is about as dedicated to the scientific method as they get.


Hitchens was about as far from an even intellectual as you can get, Crash. He actually supported the Jesus Myth Theory and would routinely, during debate, dodge and avoid any rebuttals to his opponents points with insult and mockery. When presented with the fine tuning argument he responded by making a pithy comment about how our world would eventually be destroyed when our sun goes supernova and finished with, "Some design." That's not dealing with the problem, is condescending the argument and assuming that this replaces the need for good argumentation and evidence.

Harris during his debate with Craig literally ignored everything he said and preached from a soap-box the entire time, spending the whole presentation swimming in red herrings and logical fallacies. He had no commitment to even discuss the subject, he quite literally just wanted to preach. He also, again, may be good in his field but in the field of philosophy and theology he's nothing more than a layman.

Dawkins is probably the worst of the lot in that he openly admits he hasn't bothered to study theology or philosophy, all the while touting it as failing, and routinely engaged in faith based statements. When confronted with the fine tuning he acknowledged it and stated, "We should hold out hope that an equally powerful theory to Darwinism will be found for physics." He is not engaging this on an intellectual level, he's merely seeking to find "outs" so that he can deny the premise.

I mean this rather literally, it's not that the atheists I debate with are looking, open mindedly, for evidence of God. What they're looking for when they're presented with evidence for God is any and all excuses to abandon this evidence, or obfuscate it. Find something you can complain about, and toss the baby out with the bathwater, or as I like to call it the "skeptics trump card". If you fail to defeat any conceivable doubt with your argument, then there is no conceivable doubt that your argument has failed.

These are not intellectual attempts at dealing with the problem, they're rather emotional attempts at rationalizing away the fact that they cannot engage the problem at an intellectual level.

Quote:
Turn the other cheek, love your enemies?  Not seeing any reason that a representative of Christ might be compelled to rise above petty internet name calling?


It's this kind of logic that I find to be rather distasteful. You don't even believe in Christ as God and yet you're citing his words as a reason why I shouldn't stand up against atheists who are only seeking to mock, belittle, condescend, and humiliate me? This is something I see on the odd occasion and I find it to be a twisting of biblical teachings. Just because I am to be a sheep of God, does not mean I cannot defend myself either through the internet, or in person, and for any atheist to cite these teachings as reasons why I shouldn't swing back at them when they swing at me is simply, in my opinion, an exercise in attempting to justify why Christians aren't allowed to illuminate the childishness of these attacks. If you didn't want to get your nose broken (metaphorically) you shouldn't have taken a swing at someone.

The reality is this "New Atheism" is nothing more than a group of anti-intellectual thugs who try and discourage belief in God through mockery, condescension, and bullying tactics. Just watch Dr. Craig's debate in the Cambridge Union Debating Society, The atheists there were embarrasing in their treatment of the subject matter and their condescension towards theists, their behaviour was simply ridiculous. In fact, watch several of Dr. Craigs more recent debates and listen to the crowd during the debate, what you'll hear is atheists jeering and yelling while Dr. Craig is speaking.

These atheists are not interested in the evidence. I've engaged in many an angry new atheist in debate and when I present them with that "top ten" list I throw up on the threads here they either bounce off the thread, or seek the flimsiest of excuse to abandon the argument, and in turn mock both the argument and the theist. There is never any intellectual rebuttal given, and the few that have been attempted are based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the subject material. And so since these atheists are not interested in debating the issue, as such we theists cannot confront them with evidence, we must confront this behaviour because it's all the substance new atheists have.

So I'll never accept an atheist saying, "Turn the other cheek" when I illuminate the infantile behaviour of trolling New Atheists, simply because if they truly were committed to rational discourse about God they shouldn't be engaging the subject with such hostility as to cause me to need to turn the other cheek when they openly mock and belittle my God.
GRWelsh
Reply with quote  #35 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerome92085
If their arguments are so bad?


If you're a theist... you tell us why the New Atheists are so popular.  After all, they wouldn't have best-sellers if only atheists bought their books.  It stands to reason that what is making these books into best-sellers is that not only atheists but also theists are buying them!

That's what I am interested in -- what is the appeal of the New Atheists to all of you theists?  Why are you giving them so much attention and buying so many of their books?  What is it about them that you find so fascinating?
SeekingTruth
Reply with quote  #36 
Because even theists (those who don't have blind faith) are interested in the other side's view, perhaps in hope of a challenging argument, etc.
It's very clear to me why the new atheists, especially the Four Horsemen are so popular, by the way:
1. They don't dwelve into deep philosophical territory, making their published material easier to access for the masses.
2. Their view resonates beautifully with most of the current western youth's general take on life.
3. They're quite charismatic. You can't dislike Dennett with that huge santa beard, for example.
CrashTestAuto
Reply with quote  #37 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawless

It's this kind of logic that I find to be rather distasteful. You don't even believe in Christ as God and yet you're citing his words as a reason why I shouldn't stand up against atheists who are only seeking to mock, belittle, condescend, and humiliate me? This is something I see on the odd occasion and I find it to be a twisting of biblical teachings. Just because I am to be a sheep of God, does not mean I cannot defend myself either through the internet, or in person, and for any atheist to cite these teachings as reasons why I shouldn't swing back at them when they swing at me is simply, in my opinion, an exercise in attempting to justify why Christians aren't allowed to illuminate the childishness of these attacks. If you didn't want to get your nose broken (metaphorically) you shouldn't have taken a swing at someone.


Distasteful seems an odd word.  I said you should rise above it, rather than stoop to a level you spend pages criticising.  You asked why you should do so.  I gave you a reason it was of benefit to you and Christianity.  You asked why Christians should behave better than atheists.  I pointed out that Christ told you to.

It's like asking why I'm allowed to have extra-marital sex and you aren't.  The most powerful, intelligent and moral being in the universe told you not to.  If you don't want to look like an idiot (for ignoring Him), or a hypocrite (for claiming you follow Him), then you'd do well to listen to Him.  As I don't tend to spend pages making generalisations about theists, or personally insulting specific theists, I am not an example to compare yourself to.  But the atheists to which you are referring are living up to the same standard that you claim to.  They literally don't have to play by your rules.

EDIT: Oh, I should say.  I ignored the rest of your post because it was just a lot of ad hom I disagreed with and saw no way to reasonably discuss with you.  I read it, I accept it is your opinion, but it isn't worth an argument.
Lawlessone777
Reply with quote  #38 
Quote:
Distasteful seems an odd word.  I said you should rise above it, rather than stoop to a level you spend pages criticising.  You asked why you should do so.  I gave you a reason it was of benefit to you and Christianity.  You asked why Christians should behave better than atheists.  I pointed out that Christ told you to.

It's like asking why I'm allowed to have extra-marital sex and you aren't.  The most powerful, intelligent and moral being in the universe told you not to.  If you don't want to look like an idiot (for ignoring Him), or a hypocrite (for claiming you follow Him), then you'd do well to listen to Him.  As I don't tend to spend pages making generalisations about theists, or personally insulting specific theists, I am not an example to compare yourself to.  But the atheists to which you are referring are living up to the same standard that you claim to.  They literally don't have to play by your rules.

I don't exactly see why you would bother stating that you ignored my post, I wasn't making any particular statement against any rebuttal, I was simply noting the moral situation we Christians find ourselves in nowadays and the atheistic response to these moral dilemmas.

You see, Crash, Christ tasked us to be sheep amongst men, to give of ourselves whenever we were asked, and to be more righteous than non-believers due to our love of God. Christ did not, contrary to this style of opinion, task us to allow ourselves to be victimized at the hands of other people who are doing so exclusively to attack our faith.

You should stop for a second and consider the actual underlying message of that logic, Crash, and really boil it down. What you're saying is that Christians shouldn't resist verbal abuse at the hands of atheists because the tennants of their faith call for passivism. And yet those atheists don't even adhere to the same belief system. Really, think about it, those atheists who say this after a Christian tells them to "f off" are in essence telling the Christian, "If I abuse you it's not okay for you to defend yourself and attack me back, because then you're a hypocrite, but because I don't believe in God its' okay for me."

I'm not saying you adhere to that logic, to be clear Crash, but I have encountered several atheists that do and it's the kind of pathetic logic used by a schoolyard bully.
CrashTestAuto
Reply with quote  #39 
I'm not saying that.  I'm saying that you should not behave in that way, and neither should I.  You simply have more reason not to than I do.

The point is that you feel it is justified to stoop to the level of the people you criticise.  I disagree for both theist and atheist, but the theist clearly has more reason not to.
Lawlessone777
Reply with quote  #40 
Quote:
I'm not saying that.  I'm saying that you should not behave in that way, and neither should I.  You simply have more reason not to than I do.

The point is that you feel it is justified to stoop to the level of the people you criticise.  I disagree for both theist and atheist, but the theist clearly has more reason not to.

I agree that it should never come to that, and certainly no atheist, or theist should engage in that type of behaviour. However aggression is not universally wrong, this was something I learned through a lot of security and law enforcement experience. If there was a poster who came onto this board and politely asked for evidence of God, and engaged in an irenic debate, like Lehmar for a good example, who I think is atheist? Even if not, still perfectly irenic. If I acted aggressive towards him (her?) I would, in fact, be acting like a jerk.

However I'm trying to paint a picture of what it's like on this side of the fence, Crash, as you don't get nearly as many Christian trolls on your side as we do atheist trolls on ours. Similarly the mindset is different. You see, the new atheist trolls genuinely believe that mockery equates rebuttal, and so when a Christian engages them in debate they simply mock them and their arguments. Once this crowd fools some young, impressionable mind into believing that this mockery equates intellectualism that doesn't need to justify itself cuz it's, like, so intellectual (tm) then the crowd grows, and the sway of peer pressure begins. This is why you see such a massive crowd of atheist trolls swarm certain subjects and YT videos, the numbers are daunting. They all feel that, hey, if this many people are mocking it the movement must have grown from some sort of intellectual justification, right?

Well the crowd has certainly grown, and though many a person knows that they're predicated upon mockery and insult, they're beginning to outnumber rational, reasonable people (theist and atheist) on certain websites. And so eventually there needs to be someone to tell the howling mass of vitriol to shut up and actually bring intellectual debate to the table, and I want to encourage Christians to do just that. I'd very much like other Christians to know that just because Christ said "turn the other cheek" doesn't mean that you should knowingly subject yourself to abuse at the hands of other people who are knowingly exploiting the pacifist message of Jesus to enable this behaviour.
Equestions
Reply with quote  #41 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawlessone777


So I'll never accept an atheist saying, "Turn the other cheek" when I illuminate the infantile behaviour of trolling New Atheists, simply because if they truly were committed to rational discourse about God they shouldn't be engaging the subject with such hostility as to cause me to need to turn the other cheek when they openly mock and belittle my God.


I totally agree with this. Since when are Christians supposed to be punching bags for the atheists? Why is it WE are always expected to stay silent while it's OK for the atheist to act any way they choose? I get tired of the double standards displayed by most of the internet atheists. If they fight for God in the Old Testament they're 'barbaric' and 'God is evil'. If we fight for God on the internet we're 'not acting very Christian like' and 'should be more tolerant' but if an atheist wants to argue for his side he can throw hate all over the place, put down our God, mock and ridicule us, avoid any and every point made by the Christian side, and apparently that's just fine. No tolerance needed or expected from an atheist side. It's frustrating.

Now let me put in this disclaimer. I am in NO way saying that every atheist is like this. It really just seems to be a majority of the internet atheists but a lot of the atheists on this site are not really this way and almost every atheist I know personally is not really this way either. Just want to make sure that you understand I'm not trying to lump all atheists into this category. It's just a different breed that seems to hang out on the internet for some reason. I just want to state my frustration with these people and that it's not fair not to expect us to 'fight' from time to time for our God.
Geneticist
Reply with quote  #42 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawlessone777
Quote:
I'm not saying that.  I'm saying that you should not behave in that way, and neither should I.  You simply have more reason not to than I do.

The point is that you feel it is justified to stoop to the level of the people you criticise.  I disagree for both theist and atheist, but the theist clearly has more reason not to.

I agree that it should never come to that, and certainly no atheist, or theist should engage in that type of behaviour. However aggression is not universally wrong, this was something I learned through a lot of security and law enforcement experience. If there was a poster who came onto this board and politely asked for evidence of God, and engaged in an irenic debate, like Lehmar for a good example, who I think is atheist? Even if not, still perfectly irenic. If I acted aggressive towards him (her?) I would, in fact, be acting like a jerk.

However I'm trying to paint a picture of what it's like on this side of the fence, Crash, as you don't get nearly as many Christian trolls on your side as we do atheist trolls on ours. Similarly the mindset is different. You see, the new atheist trolls genuinely believe that mockery equates rebuttal, and so when a Christian engages them in debate they simply mock them and their arguments. Once this crowd fools some young, impressionable mind into believing that this mockery equates intellectualism that doesn't need to justify itself cuz it's, like, so intellectual (tm) then the crowd grows, and the sway of peer pressure begins. This is why you see such a massive crowd of atheist trolls swarm certain subjects and YT videos, the numbers are daunting. They all feel that, hey, if this many people are mocking it the movement must have grown from some sort of intellectual justification, right?

Well the crowd has certainly grown, and though many a person knows that they're predicated upon mockery and insult, they're beginning to outnumber rational, reasonable people (theist and atheist) on certain websites. And so eventually there needs to be someone to tell the howling mass of vitriol to shut up and actually bring intellectual debate to the table, and I want to encourage Christians to do just that. I'd very much like other Christians to know that just because Christ said "turn the other cheek" doesn't mean that you should knowingly subject yourself to abuse at the hands of other people who are knowingly exploiting the pacifist message of Jesus to enable this behaviour.


A lot of Christians believe mockery equals rebuttal as well. I can point you to specific examples of this in these very forums. Often it is toned down, but the principle remains the same.

I'm not saying that one should not call people out on it, but lets be honest that it is not an atheist only phenomena. Besides, after a decade of debating atheists online, I know the psychoanalysis approach whereby we assign all kinds of maladies to atheists (atheists are all angry) is a very unChristian approach and simply a failure.
Lawlessone777
Reply with quote  #43 
Quote:
I'm not saying that one should not call people out on it, but lets be honest that it is not an atheist only phenomena. Besides, after a decade of debating atheists online, I know the psychoanalysis approach whereby we assign all kinds of maladies to atheists (atheists are all angry) is a very unChristian approach and simply a failure. 

Specifically what I'm referring to, Geneticist, is defensive, not offensive. Certainly for any Christian (or any person for that matter) to engage in negative behaviour towards atheists they are not being very good Christians, especially if that negative behaviour is unprovoked. However, when an atheist is engaging in incredibly vitriolic and vulgar behaviour towards us I'm arguing that we are fully in our right to illuminate this behaviour, for that specific circumstance, in defense of our position.

You see because the "ignore it and it'll go away" thing doesn't work anymore. When you ignore the trolls, they recruit dozens more until the site is simply flooded with them. What I'm talking about specifically is when you respond to an objection brought up by an atheistic troll, and they respond by personally attacking your, or personally attacking God. Examples from this very forum, "Your God is an invisible sky daddy." or "You keep believing in that iron age myth."

Those kinds of comments will garnish a response from me to the tune of, "Those kind of words paint you as an angry, spiteful, person. If you want to debate irenically, great, otherwise your posting is just insulting and childish."

I'm talking about confronting the behaviour, not confronting "atheism" as a whole. There are plenty of non-believers on this site who are fully capable of engaging in the subject without falling into insult, or mockery, and I find it rather depressing that they're outnumbered in some weeks by howling vitriolic trolls.
Geneticist
Reply with quote  #44 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawlessone777
Quote:
I'm not saying that one should not call people out on it, but lets be honest that it is not an atheist only phenomena. Besides, after a decade of debating atheists online, I know the psychoanalysis approach whereby we assign all kinds of maladies to atheists (atheists are all angry) is a very unChristian approach and simply a failure. 

Specifically what I'm referring to, Geneticist, is defensive, not offensive. Certainly for any Christian (or any person for that matter) to engage in negative behaviour towards atheists they are not being very good Christians, especially if that negative behaviour is unprovoked. However, when an atheist is engaging in incredibly vitriolic and vulgar behaviour towards us I'm arguing that we are fully in our right to illuminate this behaviour, for that specific circumstance, in defense of our position.

You see because the "ignore it and it'll go away" thing doesn't work anymore. When you ignore the trolls, they recruit dozens more until the site is simply flooded with them. What I'm talking about specifically is when you respond to an objection brought up by an atheistic troll, and they respond by personally attacking your, or personally attacking God. Examples from this very forum, "Your God is an invisible sky daddy." or "You keep believing in that iron age myth."

Those kinds of comments will garnish a response from me to the tune of, "Those kind of words paint you as an angry, spiteful, person. If you want to debate irenically, great, otherwise your posting is just insulting and childish."

I'm talking about confronting the behaviour, not confronting "atheism" as a whole. There are plenty of non-believers on this site who are fully capable of engaging in the subject without falling into insult, or mockery, and I find it rather depressing that they're outnumbered in some weeks by howling vitriolic trolls.


Certainly confront it, but I do not think that it works to confront it as a generality. In other words, one person uses mockery in an argument, I do not think it works then to argue "Atheists.......". Been there, done that. The debate soon goes completely off-topic and becomes EXACTLY what this debate has become, largely two sides lobbing accusations of "he said she said". Rather, the better approach is to confront each person individually and call them out. This closes off any excuse for that person or other atheists to jump in and derail the topic of discussion.


CrashTestAuto
Reply with quote  #45 
I'm with Geneticist here.  Although I favour ignoring rude posters rather than giving them attention.  I've done it to a few on here, and at least two appear to have actually disappeared entirely (I suspect banned).

Also, a point of clarification.  Whilst I agree that 'invisible sky daddy' is mocking, and needless.  Christianity is a bronze age myth to an atheist.  It is the most accurate description of it, and it isn't always mocking.  It might be impolite, and it certainly isn't meant to be a compliment, but the fact that Christianity looks very similar to other myths of the time, and the outdated nature of Biblical morality, renders it a substantive, if not irenic, claim.
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Quick Navigation:



Important: The Reasonable Faith forums have moved to: www.reasonablefaith.org/forums/






Powered by Website Toolbox - Create a Website Forum Hosting, Guestbook Hosting, or Website Chat Room for your website.